Polyploidy and hybridization in Spiraea (Rosaceae): Сytogenetic insights from the hybrid Spiraea hypericifolia × S. media and its parental species in Tuvinian populations
UDC 582.734.2:575.224.234.2+575.222.7(571.52)
Keywords:
allopolyploidy, autopolyploidy, chromosome numbers, genome size, hybrids, Spiraea hypericifolia, Spiraea hypericifolia × Spiraea media, Spiraea media, Tuva
Abstract
The polyploidy and hybridization in Spiraea evolution make species identification a complex process. The cytogenetic characteristics of hybrid individuals of Spiraea hypericifolia × S. media, along with those of their parental species, S. hypericifolia L. and S. media Fr. Schmidt, have been the subject of study. The study presents findings of the newly discovered locations of the hybrid S. hypericifolia × S. media in the Republic of Tyva. This is the first study to examine the relative DNA content of S. hypericifolia × S. media individuals. Genomic analysis revealed considerable variability in total genome size, ploidy level and chromosome number among Spiraea from three mixed Tuvinian populations. The results of the cytotyping by chromosome counting and genome size determination by flow cytometry were found to be consistent. Spiraea hypericifolia was found to exhibit a strictly diploid level (2n = 2x = 18). In S. media, three euploid levels were identified for the: diploid (2n = 2x = 18), autotriploid (2n = 3x = 27), autotetraploid (2n = 4x = 36), as well as an aneuploid (2n = 24). Additionally, mixoploidy is occasionally observed in the S. media species. Among the hybrid individuals of S. hypericifolia × S. media, the expected allodiploids (Tselinnoye) and allotetraploids (Turan, Tapsa) were identified. Hypotheses regarding the appearance of autotetraploid of S. media and allodiploid and allotetraploid hybrids of S. hypericifolia × S. media have been proposed. The most probable mechanism of origin of polyploid and hybrid Spiraea species is the disruption of meiosis with the formation of 2n gametes and/or somatic endomitosis. Our findings contribute to understanding of microevolutionary processes within the genus Spiraea. The hybrid S. hypericifolia × S. media has significant potential for use in landscape design and breeding and thus requires comprehensive study.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Abbott R., Albach D., Ansell S., Arntzen J. W., Baird S. J. E., Bierne N., et al. 2013. Hybridization and speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 26: 229–246.
Alix K., Gérard P. R., Schwarzacher T., Heslop-Harrison J. S. 2017. Polyploidy and interspecific hybridization: partners for adaptation, speciation and evolution in plants. Ann. Bot. 120(2): 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02599.x
Attila Molnár V., Löki V., Máté A., Molnár A., Takács A., Nagy T., Lovas-Kiss A., Lukács B. A., Sramkó G., Tökölyi J. 2017. The occurrence of Spiraea crenata and other rare steppe plants in Pannonian graveyards. Biologia 72(5): 500–509. https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2017-0060
Bartolić P., Voltrová A., Macková L., Šrámková G., Šlenker M., Mandáková T., Garcia N. P., Marhold K., Kolař F. 2024. Overcoming ploidy barriers: the role of triploid bridges in the genetic introgression of Cardamine amara. BioRxiv: 10. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.08.617200
Bennett M. D., Leitch I. J. 2005. Genome size evolution in plants. In: T. R. Gregory (ed.). The Evolution of the Genome. Chapter 2. Elsevier Inc. P. 89.
Bennett M. D., Leitch I. J. 2011. Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms: targets, trends and tomorrow. Ann. Bot. 107(3): 467–590. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcq258
Bourge M., Brown S. C., Siljak-Yakovlev S. 2018. Flow cytometry as tool in plant sciences, with emphasis on genome size and ploidy level assessment. Genetics and Applications 2, 2: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.31383/ga.vol2iss2ppl-12
Byung-Yun S., Kim T. J., Kim C. H. 1997. A biosystematic study on polyploid populations of the genus Spiraea (Rosaceae) in Korea. J. Plant Biol. 40: 291-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03030463
Choi H. J., Eom H. S., Choi M. J., Yang S., Lee J. H. 2019. Taxonomic review of Spiraea chartacea compared with its related species of section Chamaedryon in Korea. J. Asia-Pacific Biodivers. 12(4): 631–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japb.2019.08.008
Clo J., Padilla-García N., Kolář F. 2022. Polyploidization as an opportunistic mutation: The role of unreduced gametes formation and genetic drift in polyploid establishment. J. Evol. Biol. 35(8): 1099–1109. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.14055
De Storme N., Mason A. 2014. Plant speciation through chromosome instability and ploidy change: cellular mechanisms, molecular factors and evolutionary relevance. Curr. Plant Biol. 1: 10–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpb.2014.09.002
De Vore M. L., Pigg K. B. 2007. A brief review of the fossil history of the family Rosaceae with a focus on the Eocene Okanogan Highlands of eastern Washington State, USA, and British Columbia, Canada. Plant Syst. Evol. 266: 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-007-0540-3
Dickinson T. A., Lo E., Talent N. 2007. Polyploidy, reproductive biology, and Rosaceae: understanding evolution and making classifications. Plant Syst. Evol. 266: 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-007-0541-2
Dickson E. E., Arumuganathan K., Kresovich S., Doyle J. J. 1992. Nuclear DNA content variation within the Rosaceae. Am. J. Bot. 79: 1081–1086. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1992.tb13697.x
Doležel J., Bartoš J. 2005. Plant DNA flow cytometry and estimation of nuclear genome size. Ann. Bot. 95: 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci005
Doležel J., Bartoš J., Voglmayr H., Greilhuber J. 2003. Nuclear DNA content and genome size of trout and human. Cytometry A 51: 127–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.10013
Doyle J. J., Coate J. E. 2019. Polyploidy, the nucleotype, and novelty: the impact of genome doubling on the biology of the cell. Int. J. Plant Sci. 180(1): 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1086/700636
Evans R. C., Dickinson T. A. 1999. Floral ontogeny and morphology in subfamily Spiraeoideae Endl. (Rosaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 160: 981–1012. https://doi.org/10.1086/314176
FLOWer [2026]. FLOWer, a plant DNA flow cytometry database. URL: https://botany.natur.cuni.cz/flower/ (Accessed 01 April 2026).
Fomicheva M., Domblides E. 2023. Mastering DNA content estimation by flow cytometry as an efficient tool for plant breeding and biodiversity research. Methods Protoc. 6(1): 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/mps6010018
Galbraith D. W., Harkins K. R., Maddox J. M., Ayres N. M., Sharma D. P., Firoozabady E. 1983. Rapid flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle in intact plant-tissues. Science 220: 1049–1051. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.220.4601.10
Govaerts R., Nic Lughadha E., Black N., Turner R., Paton A. 2021. The world checklist of vascular plants, a continuously updated resource for exploring global plant diversity. Sci. Data 8(1): 215. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00997-6
Hess W. J., Stoynoff N. A. 1999. A new hybrid of Spiraea (Rosaceae) from Oregon. SIDA, Contributions to Botany 18(3): 827–830. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41968903
Kew Plant DNA C content database. [2026]. URL: https://data.kew.org/cvalues (Accessed 01 April 2026).
Kohler C., Scheid O. M., Erilova A. 2010. The impact of the triploid block on the origin and evolution of polyploid plants. Trends Genet. 26: 142–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2009.12.006
Kostikova V. A., Voronkova M. S., Banaev E. V., Poliakova T. A. 2018. The estimation of relative DNA content of the genus Spiraea L., section Calospira C. Koch. Bot. Pacifica 7: 93–96. https://doi.org/10.17581/bp.2018.07114
Kostikova V. A., Voronkova M. S., Mitrenina E. Yu., Kuznetsov A. A., Erst A. S., Veklich T. N., Shabanova (Kobozeva) E. V. 2019. Estimation of the relative DNA content in species of the genus Spiraea, sections Chamaedryon and Glomerati by flow cytometry. Ukr. J. Ecol. 9: 142–149. https://doi.org/10.15421/2019_74
Laczkó L., Jordán S., Póliska S., Rácz H. V., Nagy N. A., Molnár V. A., Sramkó G. 2024. The draft genome of Spiraea crenata L. (Rosaceae) – the first complete genome in tribe Spiraeeae. Sci. Data 11(1): 219. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03046-0
Leitch I. J., Johnston E., Pellicer J., Hidalgo O., Bennett M. D. 2019. Angiosperm DNA C-values database. URL: https://cvalues.science.kew.org/ (Accessed 01 April 2026).
Loureiro J., Rodriguez E., Santos C., Doležel J., Suda J. 2008. FLOWer: A Plant DNA Flow Cytometry Database. URL: https://botany.natur.cuni.cz/flower/ (Accessed 01 April 2026).
Lynch M. 1991. The genetic interpretation of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression. Evolution 45(3): 622–629.
Mallet J. 2007. Hybrid speciation. Nat. Rev. 446: 279–283. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05706
Manzaneda A. J., Rey P. J., Bastida J. M., Weiss-Lehman C., Raskin, E. Mitchell-Olds T. 2012. Environmental aridity is associated with cytotype segregation and polyploidy occurrence in Brachypodium distachyon (Poaceae). New Phytol. 193(3): 797–805. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03988.x
Meng R., Finn Ch. 2002. Determining ploidy level and nuclear DNA content in Rubus by flow cytometry. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 127: 767–775.
Morgan D. R., Soltis D. E., Robertson K. R. 1994. Systematic and evolutionary implications of rbcL sequence variation in Rosaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 81: 890–903. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1994.tb15570.x
Oginuma K., Tatarenko I. V., Kondo K. 2004. Karyomorphology of eight species of Spiraea (Rosaceae) in Russia. Chromosome Sci. 8(1): 23–28.
Ohno S. 1970. Evolution by gene duplication. Berlin; New York: Springer-Verlag. 184 pp.
Pelé A, Rousseau-Gueutin M., Chèvre A.-M. 2018. Speciation success of polyploid plants closely relates to the regulation of meiotic recombination. Front. Plant Sci. 9: 907. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00907
Plant Chromosome Number Index database) http://www.tropicos.org/Project/IPCN
Poliakova T. A. 2022. Adaptive strategies and genetic stability of species from the Spiraea genus (Rosaceae) in natural population systems. Biology Bulletin Reviews 12: S96–S107. https://doi.org/10.1134/S207908642207009X
Poliakova T. A., Shatokhina A. V. 2021. IAPT chromosome data 35/12. In: K. Marhold, J. Kučera (eds.). IAPT chromosome data 35/12. Taxon 70(6): 1402–1411, E35–E36. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12638
Poliakova T. A., Shatokhina A. V., Politov D. V. 2022. Molecular phylogeny of Russian species of the genus Spiraea (Rosaceae) according to the nucleotide variability of the ITS nuclear rDNA region. Russ. J. Genet. 58, 11: 1297–1305. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795422110084
Положий А. В. Spiraea L. – Спирея // Флора Сибири. T. 8. Новосибирск: «Наука». Сиб. изд. фирма РАН, 1988. С. 10–20.
Полякова Т. А., Муратова Е. Н. Кариологическое исследование некоторых видов рода Spiraea (Rosaceae) флоры Дальнего Востока и Восточной Сибири // Растительный мир Азиатской России, 2015. № 2. С. 23–26.
Potter D., Still S. M., Grebenc T., Ballian D, Božič G., Franjiæ J., Kraigher H. 2007. Phylogenetic relationships in tribe Spiraeeae (Rosaceae) inferred from nucleotide sequence data. Plant Syst. Evol. 266: 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-007-0544-z
POWO [2026]. Plants of the World Online. Kew: Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens. URL: https://powo.science.kew.org/ (Accessed 09 January 2026).
Ramsey J., Schemske D. W. 1998. Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29(1): 467–501.
Ramsey J., Schemske D. W. 2002. Neopolyploidy in flowering plants, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33: 589–639. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150437
Rieseberg L. H., Willis J. H. 2007. Plant speciation. Science 317(5840): 910–914. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137729
Sattler M. C., Carvalho C. R., Clarindo W. R. 2016. The polyploidy and its key role in plant breeding. Planta 243: 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-015-2450-x
Sax K. 1936. Polyploidy and geographic distribution in Spiraea. J. Arnold Arbor. 17(4): 352–356. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43780806
Schneider C. K. 1906. Illustriertes Handbuch der Laubholzkunde. Charakteristik der in Mitteleuropa heimischen und im Freien angepflanzten angiospermen Gehölz-Arten und Formen mit Ausschluß der Bambuseen und Kakteen. Jena: Verlag von Gustav Fischer. 453 pp. [In German]
Shatokhina A. V., Poliakova T. A., Bondarevich E. A. 2022. IAPT chromosome data 38/10. In: K. Marhold, J. Kučera (eds.). IAPT chromosome data 38. Taxon 71: 1353–1360, E13–E33. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12836
Shatokhina A. V., Poliakova T. A., Veklich T. N. 2024. IAPT chromosome data 44/6. In: K. Marhold, J. Kučera (eds.). IAPT chromosome data 44. Taxon 73(6): 1554–1555. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13283
Singhal V. K., Gill B. S., Sidhu M. S. 1990. Cytology of woody members of Rosaceae. In: Proceedings Indian Academy of Sciences. New Delhi: Springer India. 100(1): 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03053464
Skaptsov M. V., Kutsev M. G., Smirnov S. V., Vaganov A. V., Uvarova O. V., Shmakov A. I. 2024. Standards in plant flow cytometry: an overview, polymorphism and linearity issues. Turczaninowia 27, 2: 86–104. https://doi.org/10.14258/turczaninowia.27.2.10
Sliwinska E. 2018. Flow cytometry – a modern method for exploring genome size and nuclear DNA synthesis in horticultural and medicinal plant species. Folia Hort. 30(1): 103–128. https://doi.org/10.2478/fhort-2018-0011
Sliwinska E., Loureiro J., Leitch I. J., Šmarda P., Bainard J., Bureš P., Chumová Z., Horová L., Koutecký P., Lučanová M., Trávníček P., Galbraith D. W. 2021. Application-based guidelines for best practices in plant flow cytometry. Cytometry A 101(9): 749–781. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.24499
Смирнов Ю. Ускоренный метод исследования соматических хромосом плодовых // Цитология, 1968. Т. 10. С. 1132–1134.
Soltis P. S., Soltis D. E. 2000. The role of genetic and genomic attributes in the success of polyploids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97(13): 7051–7057. https://www.jstor.org/stable/122765
Sun B. Y., Kim T. J., Kim C. H. 1997. A biosystematic study on polyploid populations of the genus Spiraea (Rosaceae) in Korea. J. Plant Biol. 40: 291–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03030463
Tamayo-Ordóñez M. C., Espinosa-Barrera L. A., Tamayo-Ordóñez Y. J., Ayil-Gutiérrez B., Sánchez-Teyer L. F. 2016. Advances and perspectives in the generation of polyploid plant species. Euphytica 209: 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-016-1646-x
Temsch E. M., Koutecký P., Urfus T., Šmarda P., Doležel J. 2022. Reference standards for flow cytometric estimation of absolute nuclear DNA content in plants. Cytometry Part A 101(9): 710–724. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.24495
Tossi V. E., Martínez Tosar L. J., Laino L. E., Iannicelli J., Regalado J. J., Escandón A. S., Baroli I., Causin H. F., Pitta-Álvarez S. I. 2022. Impact of polyploidy on plant tolerance to abiotic and biotic stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 13: 869423. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.869423
Vamosi J. C., Dickinson T. A. 2006. Polyploidy and diversification: a phylogenetic investigation in Rosaceae. Int. J. Plant Sci. 167(2): 349–358.
Van de Peer Y., Mizrachi E., Marchal K. 2017. The evolutionary significance of polyploidy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 18(7): 411–424. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2017.26
Whitlock R., Stewart G. B., Goodman S. J., Piertney S. B., Butlin R. K., Pullin A. S., Burke T. 2013. A systematic review of phenotypic responses to between-population outbreeding. Environmental Evidence 2: 1–21. http://www.environmentalevidencejournal.org/content/2/1/13
Xiang Y., Huang C. H., Hu Y., Wen J., Li S., Yi T., Chen H., Xiang J., Ma H. 2017. Evolution of Rosaceae fruit types based on nuclear phylogeny in the context of geological times and genome duplication. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34(2): 262–281. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw242
Zabel H. 1884. Uebersicht der kultivirten strauchigen Spiraeen. Bd. 3. Berlin: Garten-Zeitung (Wittmack). 632 pp.
Zabel H. 1893. Die strauchigen Spiräen der deutschen Gärten. Berlin: Verlag von Paul Parey. 128 pp.
Zhang S. D., Yan K., Ling L. Z. 2023. Characterization and phylogenetic analyses of ten complete plastomes of Spiraea species. BMC Genomics 24(1): 137. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09242-3
Alix K., Gérard P. R., Schwarzacher T., Heslop-Harrison J. S. 2017. Polyploidy and interspecific hybridization: partners for adaptation, speciation and evolution in plants. Ann. Bot. 120(2): 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02599.x
Attila Molnár V., Löki V., Máté A., Molnár A., Takács A., Nagy T., Lovas-Kiss A., Lukács B. A., Sramkó G., Tökölyi J. 2017. The occurrence of Spiraea crenata and other rare steppe plants in Pannonian graveyards. Biologia 72(5): 500–509. https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2017-0060
Bartolić P., Voltrová A., Macková L., Šrámková G., Šlenker M., Mandáková T., Garcia N. P., Marhold K., Kolař F. 2024. Overcoming ploidy barriers: the role of triploid bridges in the genetic introgression of Cardamine amara. BioRxiv: 10. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.08.617200
Bennett M. D., Leitch I. J. 2005. Genome size evolution in plants. In: T. R. Gregory (ed.). The Evolution of the Genome. Chapter 2. Elsevier Inc. P. 89.
Bennett M. D., Leitch I. J. 2011. Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms: targets, trends and tomorrow. Ann. Bot. 107(3): 467–590. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcq258
Bourge M., Brown S. C., Siljak-Yakovlev S. 2018. Flow cytometry as tool in plant sciences, with emphasis on genome size and ploidy level assessment. Genetics and Applications 2, 2: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.31383/ga.vol2iss2ppl-12
Byung-Yun S., Kim T. J., Kim C. H. 1997. A biosystematic study on polyploid populations of the genus Spiraea (Rosaceae) in Korea. J. Plant Biol. 40: 291-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03030463
Choi H. J., Eom H. S., Choi M. J., Yang S., Lee J. H. 2019. Taxonomic review of Spiraea chartacea compared with its related species of section Chamaedryon in Korea. J. Asia-Pacific Biodivers. 12(4): 631–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japb.2019.08.008
Clo J., Padilla-García N., Kolář F. 2022. Polyploidization as an opportunistic mutation: The role of unreduced gametes formation and genetic drift in polyploid establishment. J. Evol. Biol. 35(8): 1099–1109. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.14055
De Storme N., Mason A. 2014. Plant speciation through chromosome instability and ploidy change: cellular mechanisms, molecular factors and evolutionary relevance. Curr. Plant Biol. 1: 10–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpb.2014.09.002
De Vore M. L., Pigg K. B. 2007. A brief review of the fossil history of the family Rosaceae with a focus on the Eocene Okanogan Highlands of eastern Washington State, USA, and British Columbia, Canada. Plant Syst. Evol. 266: 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-007-0540-3
Dickinson T. A., Lo E., Talent N. 2007. Polyploidy, reproductive biology, and Rosaceae: understanding evolution and making classifications. Plant Syst. Evol. 266: 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-007-0541-2
Dickson E. E., Arumuganathan K., Kresovich S., Doyle J. J. 1992. Nuclear DNA content variation within the Rosaceae. Am. J. Bot. 79: 1081–1086. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1992.tb13697.x
Doležel J., Bartoš J. 2005. Plant DNA flow cytometry and estimation of nuclear genome size. Ann. Bot. 95: 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci005
Doležel J., Bartoš J., Voglmayr H., Greilhuber J. 2003. Nuclear DNA content and genome size of trout and human. Cytometry A 51: 127–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.10013
Doyle J. J., Coate J. E. 2019. Polyploidy, the nucleotype, and novelty: the impact of genome doubling on the biology of the cell. Int. J. Plant Sci. 180(1): 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1086/700636
Evans R. C., Dickinson T. A. 1999. Floral ontogeny and morphology in subfamily Spiraeoideae Endl. (Rosaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 160: 981–1012. https://doi.org/10.1086/314176
FLOWer [2026]. FLOWer, a plant DNA flow cytometry database. URL: https://botany.natur.cuni.cz/flower/ (Accessed 01 April 2026).
Fomicheva M., Domblides E. 2023. Mastering DNA content estimation by flow cytometry as an efficient tool for plant breeding and biodiversity research. Methods Protoc. 6(1): 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/mps6010018
Galbraith D. W., Harkins K. R., Maddox J. M., Ayres N. M., Sharma D. P., Firoozabady E. 1983. Rapid flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle in intact plant-tissues. Science 220: 1049–1051. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.220.4601.10
Govaerts R., Nic Lughadha E., Black N., Turner R., Paton A. 2021. The world checklist of vascular plants, a continuously updated resource for exploring global plant diversity. Sci. Data 8(1): 215. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00997-6
Hess W. J., Stoynoff N. A. 1999. A new hybrid of Spiraea (Rosaceae) from Oregon. SIDA, Contributions to Botany 18(3): 827–830. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41968903
Kew Plant DNA C content database. [2026]. URL: https://data.kew.org/cvalues (Accessed 01 April 2026).
Kohler C., Scheid O. M., Erilova A. 2010. The impact of the triploid block on the origin and evolution of polyploid plants. Trends Genet. 26: 142–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2009.12.006
Kostikova V. A., Voronkova M. S., Banaev E. V., Poliakova T. A. 2018. The estimation of relative DNA content of the genus Spiraea L., section Calospira C. Koch. Bot. Pacifica 7: 93–96. https://doi.org/10.17581/bp.2018.07114
Kostikova V. A., Voronkova M. S., Mitrenina E. Yu., Kuznetsov A. A., Erst A. S., Veklich T. N., Shabanova (Kobozeva) E. V. 2019. Estimation of the relative DNA content in species of the genus Spiraea, sections Chamaedryon and Glomerati by flow cytometry. Ukr. J. Ecol. 9: 142–149. https://doi.org/10.15421/2019_74
Laczkó L., Jordán S., Póliska S., Rácz H. V., Nagy N. A., Molnár V. A., Sramkó G. 2024. The draft genome of Spiraea crenata L. (Rosaceae) – the first complete genome in tribe Spiraeeae. Sci. Data 11(1): 219. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03046-0
Leitch I. J., Johnston E., Pellicer J., Hidalgo O., Bennett M. D. 2019. Angiosperm DNA C-values database. URL: https://cvalues.science.kew.org/ (Accessed 01 April 2026).
Loureiro J., Rodriguez E., Santos C., Doležel J., Suda J. 2008. FLOWer: A Plant DNA Flow Cytometry Database. URL: https://botany.natur.cuni.cz/flower/ (Accessed 01 April 2026).
Lynch M. 1991. The genetic interpretation of inbreeding depression and outbreeding depression. Evolution 45(3): 622–629.
Mallet J. 2007. Hybrid speciation. Nat. Rev. 446: 279–283. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05706
Manzaneda A. J., Rey P. J., Bastida J. M., Weiss-Lehman C., Raskin, E. Mitchell-Olds T. 2012. Environmental aridity is associated with cytotype segregation and polyploidy occurrence in Brachypodium distachyon (Poaceae). New Phytol. 193(3): 797–805. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03988.x
Meng R., Finn Ch. 2002. Determining ploidy level and nuclear DNA content in Rubus by flow cytometry. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 127: 767–775.
Morgan D. R., Soltis D. E., Robertson K. R. 1994. Systematic and evolutionary implications of rbcL sequence variation in Rosaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 81: 890–903. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1994.tb15570.x
Oginuma K., Tatarenko I. V., Kondo K. 2004. Karyomorphology of eight species of Spiraea (Rosaceae) in Russia. Chromosome Sci. 8(1): 23–28.
Ohno S. 1970. Evolution by gene duplication. Berlin; New York: Springer-Verlag. 184 pp.
Pelé A, Rousseau-Gueutin M., Chèvre A.-M. 2018. Speciation success of polyploid plants closely relates to the regulation of meiotic recombination. Front. Plant Sci. 9: 907. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00907
Plant Chromosome Number Index database) http://www.tropicos.org/Project/IPCN
Poliakova T. A. 2022. Adaptive strategies and genetic stability of species from the Spiraea genus (Rosaceae) in natural population systems. Biology Bulletin Reviews 12: S96–S107. https://doi.org/10.1134/S207908642207009X
Poliakova T. A., Shatokhina A. V. 2021. IAPT chromosome data 35/12. In: K. Marhold, J. Kučera (eds.). IAPT chromosome data 35/12. Taxon 70(6): 1402–1411, E35–E36. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12638
Poliakova T. A., Shatokhina A. V., Politov D. V. 2022. Molecular phylogeny of Russian species of the genus Spiraea (Rosaceae) according to the nucleotide variability of the ITS nuclear rDNA region. Russ. J. Genet. 58, 11: 1297–1305. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795422110084
Положий А. В. Spiraea L. – Спирея // Флора Сибири. T. 8. Новосибирск: «Наука». Сиб. изд. фирма РАН, 1988. С. 10–20.
Полякова Т. А., Муратова Е. Н. Кариологическое исследование некоторых видов рода Spiraea (Rosaceae) флоры Дальнего Востока и Восточной Сибири // Растительный мир Азиатской России, 2015. № 2. С. 23–26.
Potter D., Still S. M., Grebenc T., Ballian D, Božič G., Franjiæ J., Kraigher H. 2007. Phylogenetic relationships in tribe Spiraeeae (Rosaceae) inferred from nucleotide sequence data. Plant Syst. Evol. 266: 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-007-0544-z
POWO [2026]. Plants of the World Online. Kew: Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens. URL: https://powo.science.kew.org/ (Accessed 09 January 2026).
Ramsey J., Schemske D. W. 1998. Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29(1): 467–501.
Ramsey J., Schemske D. W. 2002. Neopolyploidy in flowering plants, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33: 589–639. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150437
Rieseberg L. H., Willis J. H. 2007. Plant speciation. Science 317(5840): 910–914. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1137729
Sattler M. C., Carvalho C. R., Clarindo W. R. 2016. The polyploidy and its key role in plant breeding. Planta 243: 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-015-2450-x
Sax K. 1936. Polyploidy and geographic distribution in Spiraea. J. Arnold Arbor. 17(4): 352–356. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43780806
Schneider C. K. 1906. Illustriertes Handbuch der Laubholzkunde. Charakteristik der in Mitteleuropa heimischen und im Freien angepflanzten angiospermen Gehölz-Arten und Formen mit Ausschluß der Bambuseen und Kakteen. Jena: Verlag von Gustav Fischer. 453 pp. [In German]
Shatokhina A. V., Poliakova T. A., Bondarevich E. A. 2022. IAPT chromosome data 38/10. In: K. Marhold, J. Kučera (eds.). IAPT chromosome data 38. Taxon 71: 1353–1360, E13–E33. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12836
Shatokhina A. V., Poliakova T. A., Veklich T. N. 2024. IAPT chromosome data 44/6. In: K. Marhold, J. Kučera (eds.). IAPT chromosome data 44. Taxon 73(6): 1554–1555. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.13283
Singhal V. K., Gill B. S., Sidhu M. S. 1990. Cytology of woody members of Rosaceae. In: Proceedings Indian Academy of Sciences. New Delhi: Springer India. 100(1): 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03053464
Skaptsov M. V., Kutsev M. G., Smirnov S. V., Vaganov A. V., Uvarova O. V., Shmakov A. I. 2024. Standards in plant flow cytometry: an overview, polymorphism and linearity issues. Turczaninowia 27, 2: 86–104. https://doi.org/10.14258/turczaninowia.27.2.10
Sliwinska E. 2018. Flow cytometry – a modern method for exploring genome size and nuclear DNA synthesis in horticultural and medicinal plant species. Folia Hort. 30(1): 103–128. https://doi.org/10.2478/fhort-2018-0011
Sliwinska E., Loureiro J., Leitch I. J., Šmarda P., Bainard J., Bureš P., Chumová Z., Horová L., Koutecký P., Lučanová M., Trávníček P., Galbraith D. W. 2021. Application-based guidelines for best practices in plant flow cytometry. Cytometry A 101(9): 749–781. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.24499
Смирнов Ю. Ускоренный метод исследования соматических хромосом плодовых // Цитология, 1968. Т. 10. С. 1132–1134.
Soltis P. S., Soltis D. E. 2000. The role of genetic and genomic attributes in the success of polyploids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97(13): 7051–7057. https://www.jstor.org/stable/122765
Sun B. Y., Kim T. J., Kim C. H. 1997. A biosystematic study on polyploid populations of the genus Spiraea (Rosaceae) in Korea. J. Plant Biol. 40: 291–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03030463
Tamayo-Ordóñez M. C., Espinosa-Barrera L. A., Tamayo-Ordóñez Y. J., Ayil-Gutiérrez B., Sánchez-Teyer L. F. 2016. Advances and perspectives in the generation of polyploid plant species. Euphytica 209: 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-016-1646-x
Temsch E. M., Koutecký P., Urfus T., Šmarda P., Doležel J. 2022. Reference standards for flow cytometric estimation of absolute nuclear DNA content in plants. Cytometry Part A 101(9): 710–724. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.24495
Tossi V. E., Martínez Tosar L. J., Laino L. E., Iannicelli J., Regalado J. J., Escandón A. S., Baroli I., Causin H. F., Pitta-Álvarez S. I. 2022. Impact of polyploidy on plant tolerance to abiotic and biotic stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 13: 869423. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.869423
Vamosi J. C., Dickinson T. A. 2006. Polyploidy and diversification: a phylogenetic investigation in Rosaceae. Int. J. Plant Sci. 167(2): 349–358.
Van de Peer Y., Mizrachi E., Marchal K. 2017. The evolutionary significance of polyploidy. Nat. Rev. Genet. 18(7): 411–424. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2017.26
Whitlock R., Stewart G. B., Goodman S. J., Piertney S. B., Butlin R. K., Pullin A. S., Burke T. 2013. A systematic review of phenotypic responses to between-population outbreeding. Environmental Evidence 2: 1–21. http://www.environmentalevidencejournal.org/content/2/1/13
Xiang Y., Huang C. H., Hu Y., Wen J., Li S., Yi T., Chen H., Xiang J., Ma H. 2017. Evolution of Rosaceae fruit types based on nuclear phylogeny in the context of geological times and genome duplication. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34(2): 262–281. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw242
Zabel H. 1884. Uebersicht der kultivirten strauchigen Spiraeen. Bd. 3. Berlin: Garten-Zeitung (Wittmack). 632 pp.
Zabel H. 1893. Die strauchigen Spiräen der deutschen Gärten. Berlin: Verlag von Paul Parey. 128 pp.
Zhang S. D., Yan K., Ling L. Z. 2023. Characterization and phylogenetic analyses of ten complete plastomes of Spiraea species. BMC Genomics 24(1): 137. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-023-09242-3
Published
2026-04-14
How to Cite
Poliakova T. A., Shatokhina A. V., Fomicheva M. G., Politov D. V. Polyploidy and hybridization in Spiraea (Rosaceae): Сytogenetic insights from the hybrid Spiraea hypericifolia × S. media and its parental species in Tuvinian populations // Turczaninowia, 2026. Vol. 29, № 1. P. 145–160 DOI: 10.14258/turczaninowia.29.1.19. URL: https://turczaninowia.asu.ru/article/view/19244.
Section
Science articles
Turczaninowia is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Turczaninowia allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to Turczaninowia) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
