The variability and specificity of the histone H1 among the Siberian species Elymus transbaicalensis, E. komarovii, E. sajanensis, E. kronokensis (Poaceae) and some morphologically deviating forms

  • A.V. Agafonov Central Siberian Botanical Garden SB RAS Email: agalex@mail.ru
  • D.E. Nikonova (Gerus) Central Siberian Botanical Garden SB RAS Email: agalex@mail.ru
  • E.V. Shabanova (Kobozeva) National Research Tomsk State University Email: ekobozeva87@mail.ru
Keywords: Elymus, histone H1, introgression, microevolution, morphology, Poaceae, protein electrophoresis

Abstract

As the result of introgression and genetic recombination between the species a number of morphologically deviating forms arises in many mixed populations of the genus Elymus L. The study of electrophoretic variability in histone H1 among Siberian species Elymuskomarovii, E. transbaicalensis, E. kronokensisand E. sajanensis  to reveal microevolutionary levels of differentiation was carried out. It has been shown that the variation in E. komarovii was higher than in E. transbaicalensis in the Republic of Altai, and some biotypes E. komarovii were identical on this characteristic to the majority of biotypes of E. transbaicalensis. Morphologically deviating forms of E. transbaicalensiswith atypical for this species glabrate lemmas and approximating on this character to E. kronokensis are just one of the morphotypes of E. transbaicalensis. The biotypes of E. komarovii from the classic habitat in the Eastern Sayan were identical by histone H1 to some biotypes from the Altai Mountains, where the center of diversity for E. komarovii is situated presumably. E. sajanensis is the most variable in a composition of histone H1 subtypes in Siberia. This may be due to the fact that the species is formed by a number of isolated Alpine populations, some of which are derived from local biotypes of E. transbaicalensis. Some Siberian biotypes corresponding to E. sajanensis and E. kronokensis from close habitats had identical profiles of histone H1. This indirectly suggests that Siberian biotypes which are similar morphologically to Far Eastern biotypes of E. kronokensis are distant phylogenetically from the last, and probably need to be relegated to independent taxonomic rank.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Agafonov A. V. 2004. Intraspecific structure and reproductive relationships between Elymusmutabilis and E. transbaicalensis (Poaceae) in Southern Siberia from the viewpoint of taxonomical genetics.Rus. J. Genetics 40(11): 1229–1238.
Agafonov A. V., Agafonova O. V. 1992. SDS-electrophoresis of endosperm protein in Elymus L. species with different genomic consitution.Sib. Biol. Zhurn. 3: 7–12 [InRussian]. (Агафонов А. В., Агафонова О. В.SDS-электрофорез белков эндосперма у представителей рода Пырейник (ElymusL.) с различной геномной структурой // Сиб. биол. журн., 1992.Вып. 3. С. 7–12).
Agafonov A. V., IlyushkoM. V., SalomonB., DiazO., vonBothmerR. 2002. Biosystematic study of Elymuskomarovii (Poaceae) and its relationships with morphologically close taxa E. transbaicalensisand E. alaskanuss. l.
In: Problemy botaniki Juzhnoy Sibiri i Mongolii [Problems of botany of Southern Siberia and Mongolia: Proceedings of the I international scientific and practical conference]. AzBuka, Barnaul,83–95 pp. [In Russian]. (АгафоновА. В., ИлюшкоМ. В., СаломонБ., ДиасО., вонБотмерР. БиосистематическоеисследованиеElymus komarovii (Poaceae) всравнениисморфологическиблизкимитаксонамиE. transbaicalensis иE. alaskanus s. l. // Проблемы ботаники Южной Сибири и Монголии: Материалы I междунар.науч.-практ.конф. Барнаул: Изд-во «АзБука», 2002. С. 83–95. URL: http://elibrary.asu.ru/xmlui/bitstream/handle/asu/408/read.7book?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Agafonov A. V., Salomon B., Kostina E. V., Diaz O. 1998. Biosystematic relationships between Elymuskomarovii (Nevski) Tzvel.and related species. Triticeae III. Ed. A. A. Jaradat. Science Publishers, Enfield, New Hampshire, 77–84 pp.
Barkworth M. E., Cambell J. J. N., Salomon B. 2007. Elymus L. In: Flora of North America. Vol. 24.Oxford University Press, New York & Oxford, 288–343 pp.
BeljaevA. I., BerdnikovV. A. 1985. Intraspecific polymorphism of a histone in wild-growing species of legumes. Russian journal of genetics 21(4): 605–613 [In Russian]. (БеляевА. И.,БердниковВ. А.Внутривидовойполиморфизмгистонадикорастущихвидовбобовых // Генетика, 1985. Т. 21, № 4. С. 605–613).
Berdnikov V. A., Bogdanova V. S., Gorel F. L., Kosterin O. E. Trusov Yu. A. 2003. Borovikov V. P. 1998. Populyarnoyevvedeniye v programmu STATISTICA [Popular introduction into the program STATISTICA].KompyuterPress, Moscow, 267 pp. [InRussian]. (БоровиковВ. П.ПопулярноевведениевпрограммуSTATISTICA.М.: Компьютер Пресс, 1998. 267 с.).
Berdnikov V. A., BogdanovaV. S., GorelF. L., RozovS. M. 1992. Territorial distribution of histone H1 alleles in a population of Viciaunijuga A. Br. formed after urbanization of natural habitat. Can. J. Bot. 70: 1591–1595.DiazO., SalomonB., BothmerR. von. 1999. Genetic variation and differentiation in Nordic populations of Elymusalaskanus (Scrib. ex Merr.) Lӧve (Poaceae). Theor. Appl. Genet. 99: 210–217.
Fyodorov D. V., Zhou B. R., Skoultchi A. I., Bai Y. 2018. Emerging roles of linker histones in regulating chromatin structure and function.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.19(3): 192–206. DOI: 10.1038/nrm.2017.94
Gantt J. S., Lenvik T. R. 1991. Arabidopsis thaliana H1 histones.Analysis of two members of a small gene family.Eur. J. Biochem. 202: 1029–1039.
Gerus D. E., Agafonov A. V. 2007a. Evidence of interspecific introgression in compound populations of Elymuskomarovii, E. transbaicalensis (Triticeae: Poaceae) and some morphologically similar species in Altai Mountains. Sib. botan.vestnik[Siberian botanical reporter: electronical journal] 2(1): 17–25 [In Russian]. (Герус Д. Е., Агафонов А. В.Свидетельства межвидовой интрогрессии в смешанных популяциях Elymuskomarovii, E. transbaicalensis (Triticeae:Poaceae) и некоторых морфологически близких видов Горного Алтая // Сиб. ботан. вестник: электронный журнал, 2007а. Т. 2, вып. 1. С. 17–25).URL: http://www.csbg.nsc.ru/uploads/journal.csbg.ru/pdfs/i2.pdf
Gerus D. E., Agafonov A. V. 2007b. Endosperm proteins as markers of interspecific introgression in compound populations of Elymuskomarovii, E. transbaicalensis, E. sajanensisand E. «kronokensis» (Triticeae: Poaceae) in the Eastern Sayan. Sib. botan.vestnik [Siberian botanical reporter: electronical journal] 2(2): 33–42 [In Russian]. (ГерусД. Е.,АгафоновА. В.Белкиэндосперма – маркерымежвидовойинтрогрессиивсмешанныхпопуляцияхElymuskomarovii, E. transbaicalensis, E. sajanensisи E. «kronokensis» (Triticeae: Poaceae) ВосточногоСаяна // Сиб. ботан. вестник: электронныйжурнал, 2007б. Т. 2, вып. 2. С. 33–42).URL: http://www.csbg.nsc.ru/uploads/journal.csbg.ru/pdfs/i3.pdf
Hurley C. K., Stout J. T. 1980.Maize histone H1, a partial structural characterization.Biochemistry 19: 410–416.
Ivanchenko M., Georgieva E., Uschewa A., Avramova Z. 1987. A study on the heterogeneity of histone H1 from dry maize embryos.Eur. J. Biochem. 162: 339–344.
Jenuwein T., Allis C. D. 2002. Translating the histone code.Science 293: 1074–1080.
Jerzmanowski A., Przewłoka M., Grasser K. D. 2000. Linker histones and HMG1 proteins of higher plants.Plant Biology 2: 586–597.
Kasinsky H. E., Lewis J. D., Dacks J. B., Austio J. 2001. Origin of H1 linker histones.FASEB J. 15: 34–41.
Kobozeva E. V., Agafonov A. V. 2016. Reproductive relations between taxa of an Asian part of Russia Elymuskronokensis and E. sajanensis close to the North American complex E. alaskanus s. l. (Poaceae: Triticeae). In: Sokhraneniyeraznoobraziyarastitelnogomira v botanicheskikhsadakh: traditsii, sovremennost, perspektivy[Conservation of plant diversity in botanical gardens: traditions, current situation and future: proceedings of international conference dedicated to the 70-th anniversary of Central Siberian Botanical Garden SB RAS]. Novosibirsk, 147–150 pp. [InRussian].(Кобозева Е. В., Агафонов А. В. Репродуктивные отношения между таксонами азиатской части РоссииElymus kronokensis иE. sajanensis, близкими к северо-американскому комплексуE. alaskanuss. l.(Poaceae:Triticeae) // Сохранение разнообразия растительного мира в ботанических садах: традиции, современность, перспективы: Материалы междунар. конф., посвящ. 70-летию Центрального сибирского ботанического сада (1–8 августа 2016 г., Новосибирск). Новосибирск: ЦСБС СО РАН, 2016. С. 147–150).
Kornberg R. D., Lorch Y. 1999. Twenty-fiveyearsofthenucleosome, fundamentalparticle of the eukaryote chromosome. Cell 98: 285–294.
Kosterin O. E., Bogdanova V. S., Gorel F. L., Rozov S. M., Trusov Yu. A., Berdnikov V. A. 1994. Histone H1 of the garten pea (Pisumsativum L.): composition, developmental changes, allelic polymorphism and inheritance. Plant Science 101: 189–202.
Kostina E. V., Agafonov A. V. 2002. Electrophoretic study of polymorphism of grain storage proteins and histone H1 in Elytrigiarepens (Poaceae). Bot. Zhurn. (Moscow & St. Petersburg) 87(3): 106–115 [In Russian]. (КостинаЕ. В.,АгафоновА. В.ИзменчивостьзапасныхбелковигистонаH1 уElytrigiarepensподаннымэлектрофореза // Бот. журн., 2002. Т. 87, № 3. С. 106–115).
Krech A. B., Wulff D., Grasser K. D., Feix D. 1999. Plant chromosomal HMGI/Y proteins and histone H1 exhibit a protein domain of common origin. Gene 230(1): 1–5.
Lӧve A. 1984. Conspectus of the Triticeae.FeddesRepert. 95: 425–521.
Over R. S., Michaels S. D. 2014. Open and closed: the roles of linker histones in plants and animals. Mol. plant. 7(3): 481–491. DOI: 10.1093/mp/sst164
Peshkova G. A. 1990. Elymus L. In: Flora Sibiri [Flora of Siberia]. Vol. 2. 17–32 pp. [In Russian]. (ПешковаГ. А.Elymus L. – Пырейник // ФлораСибири. Т. 2. Новосибирск, 1990. С. 17–32).
Rosa S., Shaw P. 2013. Insights into chromatin structure and dynamics in plants. Biology 2(4): 1378–1410. DOI: 10.3390/biology2041378
Rozov S. M., Bogdanova V. S., Berdnikov V. A. 1986. Differences in chromosomal localization of genes encoding pea H1 histone fractions. Russian journal of genetics 22(8): 2159–2167 [In Russian]. (РозовС. М., БогдановаВ. С., БердниковВ. А. Различиявхромосомнойлокализациигенов, кодирующихфракциигистона H1 гороха // Генетика, 1986. Т. 22,№ 8. C. 2159–2167).
ShkutinaF. M., Jakubov L. A., BerdnikovV. A. 1977. Subfractional composition of lysine-rich histone H1 under conditions of gene interaction in the tribe Triticinae.Russian journal of genetics13(9): 1517–1523 [In Russian]. (ШкутинаФ. М., ЯкубовЛ. А., БердниковВ. А.Субфракционный состав лизин-богатогогистона Н1 в условия хгенного взаимодействия в трибеTriticinae // Генетика, 1977. Т. 13, № 9. С. 1517–1523).
Spiker S. 1975. An evolution comparison of plant histones. Biochem. and Biophys. Acta 400: 461.
Spiker S. 1982.Histone variants in plants.J. Biol. Chem. 257(23): 14250–14255.
Sun G. L., Salomon B., Bothmer R. von. 1998. Characterization of microsatellite loci from Elymusalaskanus and length polymorphism in several Elymus species (Triticeae: Poaceae). Genome 41: 455–463.
Wierzbicki A. T., Jerzmanowski A. 2005. Suppression of Histone H1 Genes in Arabidopsis Results in Heritable Developmental Defects and Stochastic Changes in DNA Methylation.Genetics 169: 997–1008.
Published
2019-03-20
How to Cite
Agafonov A., Nikonova (Gerus) D., Shabanova (Kobozeva) E. The variability and specificity of the histone H1 among the Siberian species Elymus transbaicalensis, E. komarovii, E. sajanensis, E. kronokensis (Poaceae) and some morphologically deviating forms // Turczaninowia, 2019. Vol. 22, № 1. P. 5-18 DOI: 10.14258/turczaninowia.22.1.1. URL: http://turczaninowia.asu.ru/article/view/5331.
Section
Science articles