Evolution of the arils of Euonymus in comparison with some other genera of Celastraceae

UDC 582.766.5:581.471+581.811

Keywords: arils, degree of seed covering, development, morphological origin, morphology-anatomical structure, trends of evolution

Abstract

The family Celastraceae R. Br. is characterized by the difference between the genera according to the types of fruits and the presence of arils in fruits of representatives of some genera. Attempts to reconstruct the evolution of arils in the Celastraceae were made earlier, while trying to trace the relationship of arils with the mucilagenous pulp and wings on the seed. In particular, earlier attempts were made to reconstruct the evolution of Euonymus arils. But, at present, significant changes in the phylogeny of the genus Euonymus and the family Celastraceae as a whole, as well as new accumulated material require another revision of the evolution of arils of Euonymus. We have studied the morphology-anatomical structure of mature arils of 28 species of Euonymus, as well as (additionally) the development of arils in 8 species of the genus. It is assumed that the aril of ancestral taxa of Euonymus had a funicular-exostomal origin, partially covered the seed, was colored orange, and composed of a single-layered epidermis and undifferentiated multi-layered parenchyma. In the cells of aril there were rounded chromoplasts, and large oil drops were absent. In the process of evolution of the aril of Euonymus, funicular arils appeared, while the funicular-exostomal ones were preserved. The degree of seed covering by aril in some modern species has increased and decreased again, arils have appeared with a small “window”, partially (by 1/2–2/3) covering the seed and small fleshy structures in the basal part of the seed near funicule. The color of arils has been preserved in orange hues, but arils of some species have become red in color. The anatomical structure of the arils has changed. At present, along with multi-layer arils with a multi-layer undifferentiated or weakly differentiated parenchyma, there are arils with a strongly differentiated parenchyma and, conversely, with a parenchyma that is reduced in the process of development. In the process of evolution, fibrous and crystalline chromoplasts and large oil drops of different sizes appear in the cells of the arils.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. 2009. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 161(2): 105–121. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996
Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. 2016. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 181(1): 1–20. DOI:10.1111/boj.12385
Biral L., Simmons M. P., Smidt E. C., Tembrock L. R., Bolson M., Archer R. H., Lombardi J. A. 2017. Systematics of New World Maytenus (Celastraceae) and a New Delimitation of the Genus. Syst. Bot. 42(4): 1–14 DOI: 10.1600/036364417X696456
Бобров А. В., Меликян А. П., Романов М. С. Морфогенез плодов Magnoliophyta. М.: Книжный дом «Либроком», 2009. 400 с.
Corner E. J. H. 1953. The durian theory extended – I. Phytomorphology 3(4): 465–476.
Corner E. J. H. 1954. The durian theory extended – II. The arillate fruit and the compound leaf. Phytomorphology 4(1–2): 152–165.
Coughenour J. M., Simmons M. P., Lombardi J. A., Cappa J. J. 2010. Phylogeny of Celastraceae subfamily Salacioideae and tribe Lophopetaleae inferred from morphological characters and nuclear and plastid Genes. Syst. Bot. 35(2): 358–367. DOI: 10.1600/036364410791638289
Coughenour J. M., Simmons M. P., Lombardi J. A., Yakobson K., Archer R. H. 2011. Phylogeny of Celastraceae subfamily Hippocrateoideae inferred from morphological characters and nuclear and plastid loci. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 59: 320–330. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.02.017
Halle N. 1983. Revision des Hippocrateae (Celastreae): 3. Fruits, graines et structures placentaires. B. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. 5: 11–26.
Hou D. 1967. Sarawakodendron, new genus of Celastraceae. Blumea 15(1): 139–143.
Леонова Т. Г. Бересклеты СССР и сопредельных стран. Л.: Наука, 1974. 132 с.
Li Y.-N., Xie L., Li J.-Y., Zhang Z.-X. 2014. Phylogeny of Euonymus inferred from molecular and morphological data. J. Syst. Evol. 52(2): 149–160. DOI: 10.1111/jse.12068
Лобов В. П., Петров И. А. Хромопласты. Киев: Наукова думка, 1987. 128 с.
Lourteig A., O’Donell C. A. 1955. Las Celastrales de Argentina y Chile. Natura 1: 181–233.
Lovisetto A., Guzzo F., Tadiello A., Toffali K., Favretto A., Casadoro G. 2012. Molecular Analyses of MADS-Box Genes Trace Back to Gymnosperms the Invention of Fleshy Fruits. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29(1): 409–419.
Ma J. S. 2001. A revision of Euonymus (Celastraceae). Thaiszia 11(1/2): 1–264.
Ma J., Funston A. M. 2008. Monimopetalum Rehder. In: Flora of China. Vol. 11. Beijing-St. Louis: Science Press & Missouri Botanical Garden Press. Pp. 465–466.
Marano M. R., Serra E. C., Orellano E. G., Carrillo N. 1993. The path of chromoplast development in fruits and flowers. Plant. sci. 94(1–2): 2–17.
Matiyenko B. T. 1967. Chromoplasts of red-fleshed watermelons. Bot. Zhurn. 52(2): 229–239. [In Russian] (Матиенко Б. Т. Хромопласты красномякотных арбузов // Бот. журн., 1967. Т. 52, № 2. С. 229–239).
Меликян А. П., Савинов И. А. Сем. Celastraceae // Сравнительная анатомия семян. Т. 6. СПб.: Наука, 2000. С. 123–135.
Navaro A. M., Blackwell W. H. 1990. A revision of Paxistima (Celastraceae). Sida 14: 231–249.
Pijl van der L. 1955. Sarcotesta, aril, pulpa and the evolution of the angiosperm fruit. II. Verhandelingen der koninklijke nederlandsche akademie van wetenschappen; afdeeling natuurkunde; tweede sectie. 58: 307–312.
Quanru L., Funston A. M. 2008. Gymnosporia (Wight et Arnott) Bentham et J. D. Hooker. In: Flora of China. Vol. 11. Beijing-St. Louis: Science Press & Missouri Botanical Garden Press. Pp. 474–477.
POWO [2023]. Plants of the World Online. Kew: Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens. URL: http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org (Accessed 26 August 2023).
Савинов И. А. О гомологизации семенных покровов представителей семейства Celastraceae R. Br. // Гомологии в ботанике: опыт и рефлексия: Труды IX школы по теоретической морфологии растений «Типы сходства и принципы гомологизации в морфологии растений». СПб.: Санкт-Петербургский союз учёных, 2001. С. 297–299.
Savinov I. A. 2006. Some morphological basics for a revision of the tribe Celastreae Loes. (Celastraceae R. Br.). Wulfenia 13: 207–215.
Савинов И. А. Основные модусы морфологической эволюции в порядке Celastrales // Turczaninowia, 2011, Т. 14, № 3. С. 53–61.
Савинов И. А., Трусов Н. А., Соломонова Е. В., Ноздрина Т. Д. Структура, морфогенез и эволюционные преобразования плодов с крыловидными выростами у представителей семейства Celastraceae R. Br. // Turczaninowia, 2015, Т. 18, № 1. С. 60–66.
Sebsebe D. 1985. The genus Maytenus (Celastraceae) in NE tropical Africa and tropical Arabica. Symb. Bot. Upsal. 25, 2: 1–101.
Simmons M. P., Clevinger C. C., Savolainen V., Archer R. H., Mathews S., Doyle J. J. 2001a. Phylogeny of the Celastraceae inferred from phytochrome B gene sequence and morphology. Amer. J. Bot. 88(2): 313–325. DOI: 10.2307/2657021
Simmons M. P., Hedin J. P. 1999. Relationships and morphological character change among genera of Celastraceae sensu lato (incl. Hippocrateaceae). Ann. Mis. Bot. Gard. 86(3): 723–757.
Simmons M. P., McKenna M. J., Bacon C. D., Yakobson K., Cappa J. J., Archer R. H., Ford A. J. 2012. Phylogeny of Celastraceae tribe Euonymeae inferred from morphological characters and nuclear and plastid genes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 62: 9–20 DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.08.022
Simmons M. P., Savolainen V., Clevinger C. C., Archer R. H., Davis J. I. 2001b. Phylogeny of the Celastraceae Inferred from 26S Nuclear Ribosomal DNA, Phytochrome B, rbcL, atpB, and Morphology. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 19(3): 353–366. DOI: 10.1006/mpev.2001.0937
Трусов Н. А. Строение ариллуса Euonymus grandiflorus. К вопросу эволюции и функций присемянников // Актуальнi проблеми ботанiки та екологiï. Матерiали мiжнародноï конференцiï молодих учених. (9–13 серпня 2011 р., м. Березне, Рiвненська обл., Украïна). Киïв: ТОВ «Велес», 2011. С. 80–81.
Трусов Н. А. Морфологическая природа и функции ариллусов некоторых представителей родов Aristolochia, Asarum, Celastrus, Euonymus, Euphorbia, Viola и Taxus // Turczaninowia, 2016, Т. 19, № 3. С. 106–114. DOI: 10.14258/turczaninowia.19.3.7
Трусов Н. А. Эволюция ариллусов Euonymus 2.0 // Современные проблемы морфологии и репродуктивной биологии семенных растений: Материалы всерос. конф. с междунар. участием, посвящ. памяти Р. Е. Левиной (г. Ульяновск, 17–18 апреля 2019 г.). Сборник науч. статей. Ульяновск: Ульяновский гос. пед. ун-т им. И. Н. Ульянова, 2019. С. 46–48.
Трусов Н. А., Созонова Л. И. Развитие и строение плода у представителей рода Celastrus (Celastraceae) // Бот. журн., 2011. Т. 96, № 8. С. 1084–1090.
Трусов Н. А., Созонова Л. И. Направления эволюции присемянников у представителей родов Euonymus L. и Celastrus L. (Celastraceae R. Br.) // Фундаментальные и прикладные проблемы ботаники в начале ХХI века: Материалы Всеросс. конф. (г. Петрозаводск, 22–27 сентября 2008 г.). Ч. 1. Петрозаводск: Карельский научный центр РАН, 2008. С. 81–83.
Wyk van A. E., Mostert S. C. 1987. A new species of Putterlickia (Celastraceae) from southern Natal and Pondoland. S. Afr. J. Bot. 53, 4: 267–270.
Zhang X., Zhang Z., Stützel T. 2011. Aril development in Celastraceae. Feddes Repert. 122, 7–8: 445–455. DOI: 10.1002/fedr.201200007
Published
2023-11-01
How to Cite
Trusov N. A. Evolution of the arils of Euonymus in comparison with some other genera of Celastraceae // Turczaninowia, 2023. Vol. 26, № 3. P. 14-27 DOI: 10.14258/turczaninowia.26.3.2. URL: http://turczaninowia.asu.ru/article/view/14014.
Section
Science articles