Rare and endemic plant species of Mountain Crimea flora: a morphogenic response to conservation in the gene bank in vitro

  • Natalia N. Ivanova The Labor Red Banner Order Nikita Botanical Gardens – National Scientific Center of the RAS Email: nnivanova2017@yandex.ru
  • Valentina A. Tsiupka The Labor Red Banner Order Nikita Botanical Gardens – National Scientific Center of the RAS Email: nnivanova2017@yandex.ru
  • Olga V. Mitrofanova The Labor Red Banner Order Nikita Botanical Gardens – National Scientific Center of the RAS Email: nnivanova2017@yandex.ru
  • Irina V. Mitrofanova Main Botanical Garden named after N. V. Tsitsin RAS Email: nnivanova2017@yandex.ru
Keywords: deposition, explant, in vitro, osmotic, rare endemic, retardant

Abstract

Biotechnological approaches have been actively used in recent years to preserve rare and endemic plant species under slow growth conditions. This is reached by lowering the temperature and light intensity, increasing the osmotic concentration, introducing retardants into the culture medium. For conservation, we used microshoot segments of Lamium glaberrimum (K. Koch) Taliev (Lamiaceae), Crepis purpurea L. (Asteraceae), Scrophularia exilis Popl. (Scrophulariaceae), Silene jailensis N. I. Rubtzov (Caryophyllaceae) cultured under standard in vitro conditions for 8‒10 months. The explants were placed on ¼ MS culture medium supplemented with plant growth inhibitors: 0.2 g/L 2-chloroethyl-trimethyl-ammonium chloride (CCC) and 60 g/L sucrose. Conservation conditions were: the temperature 4–6 °C, light intensity 1.25–3.75 µM m-2 s-1, photoperiod 16 hours. Screening of the morphometric parameters indicated high viability and a decrease in growth kinetics after 12 and 24 months of deposition in the gene bank in vitro. Along with the microshoot slow growth, the formation of adventitious shoots, leaves, and roots was observed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Bell R. L., Reed B. M. 2002. In vitro tissue culture of pear: Advances in techniques for micropropagation and germplasm preservation. Proc. 8th IS on Pear.: 412–418. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.596.66
Cruz–Cruz C. A., González–Arnao M. T., Engelmann F. 2013. Biotechnology and Conservation of Plant Biodiversity. Resources 2: 73–95. DOI: 10.3390/resources2020073
Engelmann F. 2011. Use of biotechnologies for the conservation of plant biodiversity. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. – Plant 47: 5–16. DOI: 10.1007/s11627-010-9327-2
Engelmann F. 2013. Biotechnology and conservation of plant biodiversity. Resources 2: 73–95. DOI: 10.3390/resources2020073
Основы создания генбанка in vitro видов, сортов и форм декоративных, ароматических и плодовых культур: коллективная монография. Под ред. д. б. н. И. В. Митрофановой. Симферополь: ИТ «АРИАЛ», 2018. 260 с.
Gianni S., Sottile F. 2015. In vitro storage of plum germplasm by slow growth. Hort. Sci. 42: 61–69. DOI: 10.17221/186/2014-HORTSCI.
Kovalchuk I., Lyudvikova Y., Volgina V., Reed B. 2009. Medium, vessels and genotype all influence in vitro cold storage apple germplasm. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 96, 2: 127–136. DOI: 10.1007/s11240-008-9468-8
Никифоров А. Р. Биологические и морфологические особенности некоторых облигатных гляреофитов Горного Крыма // Бот. журн., 2018. Т. 103, № 8. С. 968–980.
Никифоров А. Р., Никифорова А. А. Ритмологические различия в развитии растений Lagoseris callicephala и Lagoseris purpurea (Asteraceae) // Бюллетень ГНБС, 2016. Вып. 118. С. 58–63.
Новикова Т. И. Использование биотехнологических подходов для сохранения биоразнообразия растений // Растительный мир Азиатской России, 2013. № 2(12). С. 119–128.
Mitrofanova I. V., Lesnikova-Sedoshenko N. P., Brailko V. A., Chelombit S. V., Zhdanov, I. V., Mitrofanova O. V. 2020. Biotechnological methods of propagation for some rare endemic plant species of the southern Russian flora. Acta Hortic 1285: 177–184. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2020.1285.28
Molkanova O., Egorova D., Mitrofanova I. 2018. Preservation сharacteristics of valuable plant cpecies in in vitro genebanks at russian botanical gardens. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. – Plant 4, 1: S46. DOI: 10.1007/s11627-018-9921-2
Murashige T., Skoog F. 1962. А revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with Tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15, 3: 473–497. DOI: 10.1111/ j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
Красная книга Российской Федерации (растения и грибы) / Гл. редколл.: Ю. П. Трутнев и др.; cост. Р. В. Камелин и др. М.: Тов-во науч. изд. КМК, 2008. 885 с.
Rajasekharan P. E., Sahijram L. 2015. In vitro conservation of plant germplasm. In: Plant Biology and Biotechnology. Volume II: Plant Genomics and Biotechnology. B. Bahadur, M. Venkat Rajam, L. Sahijram, K. Krishnamurthy (eds). Nev Delhi: Springer. Pp. 417–443. DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-2283-5_22
Красная книга Республики Крым. Растения, водоросли и грибы. Отв. ред. А. В. Ена, А. В. Фатерыга. Симферополь: ООО «ИТ «АРИАЛ», 2015. 480 с.
Reed B. M., DeNoma J. 2016. Medium-term in vitro storage of pear as a complementary germplasm preservation technique. Acta Hortic 1113: 251–256. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1113.37
Sarasan V., Cripps R., Ramsay M. M., Atherton C., McMichen M., Prendergast G., Rowntree J. K. 2006. Conservation in vitro of threatened plants – progress in the past decade. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. – Plant 42: 206–214. DOI: 10.1079/IVP2006769
Whitlock R., Hipperson H., Thompson D. B. A., R. K. Butlin R. K., Burke T. 2016. Consequences of in-situ strategies for the conservation of plant genetic diversity. Biological Conservation 203: 134–142. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.006
Published
2022-03-30
How to Cite
Ivanova N. N., Tsiupka V. A., Mitrofanova O. V., Mitrofanova I. V. Rare and endemic plant species of Mountain Crimea flora: a morphogenic response to conservation in the gene bank in vitro // Turczaninowia, 2022. Vol. 25, № 1. P. 24-30 DOI: 10.14258/turczaninowia.25.1.3. URL: http://turczaninowia.asu.ru/article/view/11191.
Section
Science articles